I’ve been to a lot of town council meetings. Some are
interesting. Most are not.
But I do find town councils interesting in general, just in
a how-things-work kind of way. How things work currently is to ask the federal
and state governments for money.
(This is not the interesting part. This is the depressing
part. Regardless of where you stand politically, it’s depressing to think that
towns used to be able to have things like sidewalks and stoplights on their own
dime and now they can’t.)
What’s interesting is all the bits that still work the way
they’re supposed to. How the police department connects to the fire department
which needs the help of the water department which of course is tied to the
sewer department and on and on and on. Tab A goes in slot B and then you wind
it up and hey presto! A town!
Even more interesting than that, of course, are the bits that
don’t work at all. Pieces of property that either belong to Mrs. Jones or Mr.
Smith or the Blessed Church of Apollo the Redeemer which moved to Samoa in 1978
and then dropped off the face of the earth, or maybe it’s actually the city’s
right-of-way, depending on which deed you’re reading. The council members are
very sympathetic (“We absolutely understand your position, Mrs. Jones, and I’m
sure if you hire a lawyer you can get an injunction against Mr. Smith’s emu
coop, at least temporarily), but they have no idea what to do. The city
attorney helpfully explains that legally, it looks like all parties have an
equal claim but the city will have to put a $20,000 sidewalk on the
right-of-way to establish theirs because that’s the way the land grant is written.
Public hearings are not remotely interesting, but they can
be entertaining. I have a theory: A helpful public discussion can be conducted
by as many as ten people. Get above that number, and it becomes necessary for
each question to be asked by at least three people (because they weren’t paying
attention when the other guy asked it). Go up to say, 20, and the first
question will be asked at least five times, each time more emotionally than the
last.
This is exponentially more true of radio call-in shows,
which is why I cannot listen to them.
So why am I telling you this? Oh yeah, I’m a journalist
again. Sort of. A little bit.
I gave up reporting a couple of years ago because it seemed
impossible to write hard news all day and then try to switch to fiction at
night. And initially I think this was true. I needed a break from my old life
to change gears and learn a new trade. I’m still learning, but I have enough
momentum now that I think I can try to combine the two.
And I really can’t do anything else to earn a living (I
really, really can’t—I know all writers say that, but for me it’s true), so
here I am. At the town council meeting.
They’re voting about dog poo today. After the budget
hearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment